phi sex

22 thoughts on “phi sex

  1. “man fears time but time fears the pyramids”

    yes
    every year it arises and myself having been there a few times it is unimaginable
    but our deserts do strange things and affect our senses to
    in egypt i got more emotional sensations in the desert than i did touching the pyramids and now i know why
    back in 99 i was at the pyramids for about a week in a hotel overlooking them
    i never went in them cos they were not the topic of my trip
    but i did take a camel trip into the desert to as far as you could just see the tips of the pyramids
    in there the local archetype arose and embraced and i became acutely aware how and why the koran became into writing
    the scale of the archetype was amazing possessing the whole Sahara for it`s domain
    it was then that i noticed it was completely separate from the pyramids and it had only arisen to “see” me because i came from the pyramids into it`s domain
    in fact what i had done is touched the great pyramid with my right hand from my camel then rode directly into the desert without getting off camel
    magnificent archetype of dark near black texture kilometers across and high , was the sensation and it came in a rush, full glory
    but
    defiantly would not go near a pyramid, that i noticed and it was not because it is shy
    it is wary to the point of fear on that topic”

    Related /z\

    Like

  2. “/\ is not merely symbolic, but it is also cosmological and immediate. Why is the great pyramid also a portal? I will tell you why. it is because when two lines converge or intersect, an energy gradient is generated within the aether. …..”

    Our environments experience of you experiencing what you do is okay within my experience of you is where our environment and me have gotten to to thus far following reading what you do a day or 2 ago
    And it makes me smile into laugh as is tell

    Like

  3. “For a shiny one? Like a shining one?”

    5/22/2013

    “what do we know
    we know a local event with 2 shining ones from above occurred with hebrews present
    the local event was emotional information transfer
    the motive of the shining ones from above is introduction of information to match their overview to others whom they sense want a similar overview
    information over linear time becomes overview by experience

    it looks like as a result of that local event and others local events of similar nature
    a method of going backwards was created by local people
    in going backwards, no matter which direction they went backwards in, they by default arrived at invisible forces
    they could see no more because there was no more to see of matter
    what happened at the boundary of material and non material appears to be they stopped
    thus they become contained were they are within the binding of our material dimension
    which until this day
    is how it is

    is the sensation”

    Like

  4. “On a separate front, the inventor stated that the impulses transmitted from his turn of the century Wardenclyffe wireless transmitting tower would also travel at velocities in excess of the speed of light. He likened the effect to the moon’s shadow spreading over the Earth.

    It is very difficult to explicate the first two speculations concerning tachyonic (faster than lightspeed) cosmic rays and radioactivity. However, with regard to the third claim, this suggestion that he transmitted energy at speeds in excess of the speed of light can be discussed from a variety of points of view. As the Earth has a circumference of roughly 25,000 miles, and light travels at about 186,000 miles/second, one can see that it would take light approximately 1/7th of a second to circle the Earth. But does the Earth itself exist in its own realm, that by the nature of its size transcends the speed of light? For example, does the north pole, interact/exist with the south pole instantaneously? If so, in a sense the theory of relativity is violated as nothing, accordingly, can “travel” faster than the speed of light, yet the Earth’s very electromagnetic unity belies that theory.

    Taking this concept a step further, does the solar system, or galaxy, when perceived as a functional unit, interact with itself in some way that by necessity makes a mockery of the speed of light? (The galaxy, of course, is hundreds of thousands of light years long.) In fact, when we look at photographs of galaxies, we are seeing entities that are hundreds of thousands of light years long. Certainly these systems have an orthorotational stability, and/or angular momentum which exists as a gestalt (totality) in a realm that easily transcends the speed of light and therefore, in that sense, violates relativity.2”

    http://www.wakingtimes.com/2015/04/10/tesla-vs-einstein-the-ether-the-birth-of-the-new-physics/

    Like

  5. “It’s common knowledge that the first systematic use of written symbols as a means of communication emerged in Sumer around 3,000 BCE, but now a Canadian researcher is suggesting that as far back as 40,000 years ago our ancestors communicated in writing. Genevieve von Petzinger, an anthropologist from the University of Victoria, studied hundreds of markings from 300 sites in addition to personally visiting and examining 52 caves where ancient humans had lived located in Spain, Portugal, Italy, and France. She then collected these markings in a database and looked for repeated use of the same symbol as well as for patterns of use for the different symbols.

    What she discovered was surprising: there were just 30 symbols that were used repeatedly at these hundreds of sites, and this took place over a period as long as 30,000 years. These repeated uses, however, were not evident in all the caves throughout this period. Commenting on the find, another anthropologist, April Nowell, who teaches at the University of Victoria, told CBC that each of the symbols classified by von Petzinger seems to have gone through its very own “heyday” in one of the regions studied before its use declined. What’s more, Nowell noted, the symbols first started being used in one area, for instance in Spain, and then spread to another, such as France……….”
    http://www.newhistorian.com/written-communication-may-be-40000-years-old/3851/

    Like

  6. “The loss of Australian aboriginal languages could obstruct access to unique scientific information regarding Australia’s ancient geological history, according to a story reported this week by BBC News.
    Ancient Australian aboriginal legends passed down over millennia appear to verify recent scientific discoveries regarding Australia’s ancient past. For example, cave art suggests an ancient knowledge of the heavens including beliefs in visits by ancient astronauts and a previously untapped record of natural history among the stars. Investigation of such a resource could reveal memories of ancient meteor strikes from thousands of years ago according to research by the University of New South Wales (UNSW).
    Dr Duane Hamacher of the UNSW Indigenous Astronomy Group has been able to match Aboriginal stories to impact craters dating from 4,700 years ago. One such location, at Henbury in Australia’s Northern Territory, is reflected in local oral traditions that have been passed down across the generations.
    Indigenous Aboriginal history is believed to span a period of between 40,000 to 45,000 years with some estimates indicating an Aboriginal presence in Australia some 80,000 years before the arrival of the first Europeans……”

    http://www.ancient-origins.net/news-general/aboriginal-languages-could-reveal-scientific-clues-australia-s-unique-past-00311

    Like

  7. “Wealthy humans are likely become cyborgs within 200 years as they gradually merge with technology like computers and smart phones, a historian has claimed.
    Yuval Noah Harari, a professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, said the amalgamation of man and machine will be the ‘biggest evolution in biology’ since the emergence of life four billion years ago.
    Prof Harari, who has written a landmark book charting the history of humanity, said mankind would evolve to become like gods with the power over death, and be as different from humans of today as we are from chimpanzees.
    He argued that humans as a race were driven by dissatisfaction and that we would not be able to resist the temptation to ‘upgrade’ ourselves, whether by genetic engineering or technology.
    “We are programmed to be dissatisfied, “ said Prof Harari. “Even when humans gain pleasure and achievements it is not enough. They want more and more.
    “I think it is likely in the next 200 years or so homo sapiens will upgrade themselves into some idea of a divine being, either through biological manipulation or genetic engineering of by the creation of cyborgs, part organic part non-organic.
    “It will be the greatest evolution in biology since the appearance of life. Nothing really has changed in four billion years biologically speaking. But we will be as different from today’s humans as chimps are now from us.”…..”

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/hay-festival/11627386/Humans-will-become-God-like-cyborgs-within-200-years.html

    Like

  8. “…..;And the result? Not only are the Gosford ‘Glyphs legitimate, the scribes accurately used several ancient hieroglyphs and ‘grammatical’ variations which, crucially, were not even documented in Egyptian hieroglyphic texts until 2012, immediately disproving all long-standing ‘hoax’ theories. The specific style of hieroglyphs used also provides a linguistic time-frame that places an Egyptian presence in Australia at least 2,500 years ago, while the translated text is even so detailed as to identify the ancient scribes, by name and occupation…….”
    http://wakeup-world.com/2014/10/14/hieroglyphics-experts-declare-ancient-egyptian-carvings-in-australia-authentic/

    Like

  9. When is epigenetic a not disclosure

    “Dinosaurs were warm-blooded animals that had many traits in common with mammals, finds controversial new research.

    The study, published in the journal Science, counters other popular theories, which say that dinosaurs were either cold-blooded and reptile-like, or occupied a unique intermediate category of animals that were neither fully cold nor warm-blooded.

    “Upon re-analysis, it was apparent that dinosaurs weren’t just somewhat like living mammals in their physiology — they fit right within our understanding of what it means to be a ‘warm-blooded’ mammal,” author Michael D’Emic, a Stony Brook University paleontologist, said in a press release…..”
    http://news.discovery.com/animals/dinosaurs/dinosaurs-may-have-been-warm-blooded-mammal-like-150528.htm#mkcpgn=rssnws1

    Like

  10. Translating Mayan 2012 precognition into 21st century global environmental alteration experience caused by our solar systems altering environment we discovered the Mayan meaning for planet surface life (humanity) is
    “All become shaman”

    “Babies can automatically sniff out the remedies they need to treat pain, anxiety and depression before learning to speak, an expert in animal healing has claimed.
    Caroline Ingraham discovered that animals will seek out herbal remedies such as St John’s Wort; valerian, neroli or arnica when they were suffering specific physical or behavioural conditions.
    Even caterpillars will change their diet to eat more hemlock when infected with wasp larvae.
    And she soon realised that the effect worked on her own children as well…..”
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/hay-festival/11639206/Babies-can-sniff-out-remedies-they-need-for-healing.html

    Like

  11. Phonons—the elemental particles that transmit both heat and sound—have magnetic properties, according to a landmark study supported by Ohio Supercomputer Center (OSC) services and recently published by a researcher group from The Ohio State University.
    In a recent issue of the journal Nature Materials, the researchers describe how a magnetic field, roughly the size of a medical MRI, reduced the amount of heat flowing through a semiconductor by 12 percent. Simulations performed at OSC then identified the reason for it—the magnetic field induces a diamagnetic response in vibrating atoms known as phonons, which changes how they transport heat.
    “This adds a new dimension to our understanding of acoustic waves,” said Joseph Heremans, Ph.D., Ohio Eminent Scholar in Nanotechnology and a professor of mechanical engineering at Ohio State whose group performed the experiments. “We’ve shown that we can steer heat magnetically. With a strong enough magnetic field, we should be able to steer sound waves, too.”……..”
    http://phys.org/news/2015-05-magnetism.html

    Our ability to experience what is labeled feeling is our experience of what is labeled magnetic field
    Cause of magnetic field is what is labeled electricity and what is labeled electricity incorporates within its structure the information (function) we label consciousness when we apply the same ingredients to what we know causes us to notice and measure what we label consciousness we notice………..,

    Like

  12. “That is interesting. I’m imagining playing with 3 magnets on my desk (sun, jupiter, saturn). As I move 2 of them about I may cause the 3rd one to flip and realign with the others. That is not meant to be an exact analogy but it does help me to understand what he is on about.”
    http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=15450

    This /\ and this \/ are related

    “For a very long time, academics had assumed that between the planets and the solar there was nothing, a literal empty vacuum. We’ve long since discovered the complex plasmatic environment that our planet actually inhabits. My question is simple: from all of the spacecraft instruments we have sent into space, have we found any region of our solar system at all that actually is vacuous? Or is all of it enveloped by the heliosphere and if so, why do academics still make the assumption that there is ANY region of space that is a vacuum?

    How exactly do we tell a vacuum apart from plasma in dark mode? Wouldn’t the recent discovery of Andromeda’s enormous plasma halo suggest that a) there is no “vacuous” space and b) that we’re really, really bad at being able to distinguish it?”

    http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=15823

    And then there is this to awaken to this morning

    ‘rnboyd,
    IMHO( and according to what My 5D self explained)
    Creation that We are a part of is in 3D.
    It doesn’t actually exist except as a local compression of memory.
    There is a continuous transmutation involved that involves the planets memory.

    Each individual entity is created within it’s own local memory field, and is programmed to last however long it does in what is called time, that time is relative to the dominant memory field it is within, which is Earths in our case.

    There was never any such nonesense as a big bang, matter becomes mass as it transmutes into becoming the dominant memory.
    No -thing actually exists relative to the base substance that is universe, it is all simply held in memory, thus there can easily be no-thing in the blink of an eye, as it is simply a forgetting, which is probably how the grand canyon instantly was, as a huge surge of consciousness ( plasma) resulted in a local forgetting, no errosion or great fireballs involved.

    There is a constant transfer between dimensions of consciousness to enable creation, when there is any wrong balance of the duality of spin involved all fertility struggles , and this is basically what the megalithic structures were involved with locally creating the correct balance for local fertility to occur, We are lucky to exist at a period of required balance.
    Gravity is a mere consequence of the implosion rate into creation, there is no force called gravity, it is a consequence of creation relative to the rate of creation.

    There needs to be the most extreme care involved with gravity modulation , as locally the very basic method of creation and sustaining of life is involved, and most importantly TIME alteration will be involved where time is relative to the memory it is( hard to detail that as it means tripping about in memory)
    We trip into 5D when dreaming, but our bodies ( vehicles ) remain in 3D charging up.

    EVERYTHING in 3D is within a dominant memory field, Your 3D body will become this planet , all so called rock was formerely matter.
    The great news is We are eternal beings seeking information and experience.

    With nothing to fear…..except fear.
    Kevin”
    http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=15765&start=15

    Liked by 1 person

  13. “Some notes of Special Relativity analysis.

    I’m about half way through Einstein’s 1920s book Relativity, The Special and the General Theory. I have been aware of several issues with Relativity for a while, but reading his words (translated into English) is very instructive.

    The entire edifice of Special Relativity is built on the premise that c + v and c – v do not exist. Time dilation and length contraction are both invoked to save this idea. That is it. There is nothing else to the theory, except relational considerations in mechanics, which Ernst Mach, and many before him, had already noted quite thoroughly (James Bradley, the 18th century astronomer, noted relative considerations in mechanics, and stated that it was well-known in his time (early 1700s)). Andre Assis has done an excellent job of elucidating this in recent years. http://www.ifi.unicamp.br/~assis/

    I think the central mistake is that Einstein conflates the propagation time of light from an event to an observer with the actual time of an event. Essentially, he just makes the measuring rods for distance and time elastic to eliminate the measurement differences. Craziness.

    Einstein then conflates velocity, which is a description of relative motion between two bodies, with an absolute value. He states that the length of a 1 m rod travelling at v in the direction of its length is the square root of 1 – v2/c2 of a metre. He then notes that if v = c, the result is 0, and concludes that this indicates a limit of velocity for any body. But velocity compared to what? Velocity is relative, of course.

    Imagine that body X moves away from observer O at 0.75c. This is allowed. Now imagine a body Y moving away from the same observer O, also at 0.75c. This is allowed. But if X and Y are moving in opposite directions away from O, then the velocity of X compared to Y (imagine an observer moving with X, for example) is 1.5c. This is not allowed. If relativists wish to retain c as some kind of limit, then they must also introduce an absolute frame of reference (e.g. ether or some medium) AND place a limit of 0.5c compared to the medium on all bodies.

    Einstein attempts to bypass this issue by claiming time is also affected by velocity. But this returns to the conflation of the propagation time of light from an event to an observer with the actual time of an event. Of course from either X and Y in our example above one cannot measure relationships between the other if the signal by which we make observation (in this case light) has a velocity equal to, or slower than, the relative velocity of the bodies.

    Consider another example along the same lines of reasoning as Einstein makes. Imagine an observer at point M, midway between A and B on a straight line. The observer is blind, but has good hearing. They observe the occurrence of an event at either A or B by the sound emitted. If stationary in relation to A and B, and a sound was emitted from both A and B simultaneously, the observer would “observe” these events simultaneously at M.

    Now imagine the observer moves towards A during the time the sound propagates from A and B. The sound from A would reach the observer first, obviously. Who would ever conclude from this that the events were not simultaneous, just because the observer advanced along the path of signal propagation toward A and away from B? This confuses observation of an event with the event itself.

    The attempted correction by Special Relativity was a concern for c + v and c – v. Whether c is constant or not actually turns out to be a misguided misdirection in this case. In our calculations v relates only to the change in position (given by vt) of the observer relative to the source, and hence the timing of their observation. We could just as easily say there were two stationary observers, one at M and one at M – vt (i.e. closer to A than B). Both observe the event timings differently, but that doesn’t make the event timings dependent on the position of the observer!

    I’m currently looking at the experimental results of Fizeau, which Einstein mentions as corroboration of his idea – that should be interesting.

    Anyway, I haven’t really sat down to work through my initial reactions (noted above). Any criticisms of these initial thoughts welcome.”
    http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=15847

    Like

Leave a Reply to Amadeus Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s