Illuminati Kingship

Author’s Note: From the thread made a few months ago, Illuminati Kingship. I am reposting it here so that it has its own place to live.


Well here is the thing, we are co-creators of reality.
The way that I see that, it means that the illusion of the material world is a mostly stable and coherent illusion.However, consciousness is the perceptive act that collapses probability into actuality. That means it skews potentiality. Think about how many conscious creators share in creating a material universe. All of the plants, animals, humans, even inorganic atoms contribute a presence to the field.

To ‘override’ reality with your mind as you say would be riding up against the force of a whole lot of co-conscious creators, all of which exist within a relatively stable field.

But let’s say you have this person or persons whom function with what you might call this ‘Illuminati Kingship’. Lets say it is not merely that they have a strong consciousness field, it’s more then that. They can recruit the consciousness of other cocreators to share in their vision of reality. Let’s say that have the support of plantlife. Most people don’t understand the consciousness of plants. They think plants are just dumb vegetables, and they don’t understand that the plants have a broad form of consciousness that is willingness or unwillingness, embrace or wilting.

If the environment approves of the vision of a spiritual king, the field itself bends to share in the king’s vision and skews the actual manifestation of reality across linear time. This, you see, is part of what it means to have this form of spiritual regency.

 Quoting: Kayliath Ark


In essence, they are not capable of altering the field because they have what you might call this regency, but rather they have this regency because they display the qualities of leadership that allow them to alter the field. How do they gain the consent of the environment? Because they share in the vision of the environment. How do they know the vision of the environment? Because they empathize with the heart of the earth.

They understand, because they have learned to speaking utilizing the portals that connect spirit to spirit. It’s not that they are impressing their will, their greedy desire for money, power, fame, or their own ideal world onto others through some form of mentalism or sheer power. It’s that they are receivers for the visions from brethren life that doesn’t speak the language the human ear is used to hearing. They see it and feel it as it is whispered by all the consciousness as it collides and forms a planetary wish. And that planetary wish contains within it all the dreams and hopes and desires and wills of the force of Gaia and the other Celestia who watch the events of Gaia unfold.

The one who receives these visions channels the will of the unified field. If they step within the current and start to act as a representative of planetary conscious, just watch them host even the most unlikely of happenstance swirl around them and make the impossible possible. Not because they have some sort of otherworldly force itself, but because they are a host to the force that encompasses all things and surrender their fragmented self, identity, id, desire and see what the birds see, feel what the rocks feel, churn with the living crust of the earth, break against the shore of a distant sea, die with the meat they cook, and suffer or smile with the people they meet…

It is a whole different way of existing.

 Quoting: Kayliath Ark


Some of you may remember Nietzche’s will to power, the ubermensch. etc. He was helping to flesh out the paternal pinnacle of the philosophy of power. That is, pushing it out to the fullest extent it could reach driving on force alone without empathy. For the past few thousand years it seems our society has been intent on pushing this form of power and using it to declare regency of the world, ruled by the strong. ‘might makes right’.

How far does the world come, and what does it look like in light of this philosophy, ruled entirely by this ‘shape’ of force, that is the male shape of force. What you get ultimately from that kind of force rulership is what we have right now. You get, first of all a very blunt form of consciousness that is highly constricted to the literal and material. You also get a very rarefied and polarized extremism that is just itching to snap and ravage each other, ie posed on nuclear war and opposed to conciliation with difficulty understanding across ego boundaries.

Let me put it this way: I am not a person who goes for the feminine goddess worship type of mother earth religious feeling. If you follow a philosophy like that without mother’s complementary pater/father you will eventually get exactly the same problem we have now with the absolute exaggeration of one type of energy at the expense of the other. No balance in that form of extremism can exist.

I think that the feminine and masculine needs to be understood in terms of its proper context of negative and positive attraction or repulsion. Like spin, they are dual aspects of electromagnetism that shape both consciousness and the material realm we experience within. We can’t exalt one at the expense of the other, and when they are brought out of balance all things suffer for it. We are tilted to extreme skew on the violent, blunt side of consciousness and it is leading to patterns of insanity that have never been known in more psychologically balanced societies of mankind. IE school shooter type stuff is not something that happens in a sane and balanced society.

Instead of looking at feminine and masculine in terms of roles that sexual genders ought to fulfill, as so many do, we need to see these roles in terms of what type of consciousness they bring to shape reality. The feminine force co-constructs and joins. It brings the illogical, sympathetic and unknown. The reason the Queen is necessary is to balance the world, shall we say. But can Kingly force manifest in a Queen? Can Queenly force manifest in a King? What about both in a Twin Soul? Does that have to be a ‘Gay/Trans’ thing? Of course not! They are dual aspects of a soul that when joined is alchemically perfected!

 Quoting: Kayliath Ark

22 thoughts on “Illuminati Kingship

  1. Hello Kayli. I wanted to let you know that I have been banned from posting to my thread; specifically they appear to have disallowed proxy replying. They’ve done it before, oddly the last time Cecropria was slithering around the thread. I expect to be able to return in a few days. If not, I’ll create a new thread, though I’d rather avoid that if at all possible. A bit of patience I think, will resolve the problem.


    1. Jos, that is quite odd if you have been banned from posting only in that thread. Have you considered trying to use a VPN? They are significantly more powerful than proxies and will probably get you in to the thread easily. I recommend giving it a try, we have missed you over there.


      1. I’ve tried a few things and can confirm that ALL proxy-based/VPN-based replies are banned from that specific thread. I’ve penned quite a few. Shame. I relished a bit of sparring with ‘facts>feelings’. He seems the sort filled with wind and fury. 😉 If, after a few weeks there’s still no release to posting, I may try creating a new thread. I expect it’d be erased though. Best to you.


      2. Please do try making a new thread if you’re unable to regain access! I don’t think the mods have a problem with you – Seer’s animosity is not something that is likely to beget their interference, and your presence on glp is quite invaluable. Take care Jos; of course you know where to find me (lol)


      3. Also Jos, I was thinking of combing through that whole thread and organizing all of the information that you shared and posting it here in an entry, would you be okay with me doing that? I don’t know when exactly but I’ve been thinking about it for awhile because there’s so much good stuff on that thread but its spread theoughout 90 pages


  2. Hello Kayli and Jos – this is Teq44. Kayli, if you do decide to combine the thread and move it here, I will come too. I miss communicating with Jos. And Kayli, I must say that this post of yours is just fabulous. I couldn’t agree more with what you have written here.


  3. Hello Kayli, Teq. I’ve made another attempt at the thread tonight, to no avail. I’ve decided that a new thread seems counter productive. And so, in order to continue our conversations, I’d enjoy the opportunity to communicate with you here. Frankly there were only a handful of people that remained on the old thread worth speaking to anyway. I won’t miss the inane challenges of authenticity, invitations requesting my consumption of various genitalia, or checking in on their favorite stars. This seems rather a ‘champagne alternative’ to the ‘cheap beer crowd’ that is GLP.

    I am very busy right now. Taking on new projects often effects me in various ways. As with any back-and-forth, I ask for your patience.


    1. Well I miss talking to you quite a bit Jos; you know what I think I will do? If it is alright with you I’ll make a new blog entry about that particular GLP thread. I’ve been meaning to do so anyway. Then we can talk on my blog. It’s not a particularly elegant solution but it does work. 🙂


  4. Ah wonderful. 🙂 Thank you for setting up a new post here Kayli. I look forward to communicating with you both. And it’s fine if you take your time with your responses, Jos. We are all busy – it is perfectly understandable.


  5. Kayli, if you’d prefer I simply pen a new introduction and begin anew, I’m all right with that. I don’t mind recreating thread answers as they come up.

    Hello Andrea. It’s good to see you.


    1. Well I’d love to see you back on GLP, not going to lie! I want to make a new blog post but it might take me a bit to figure out how long I want to make it and to have to time to really comb through the old thread. I say go for a new thread either way, wordpress is sort of bleh for back and forth dialogue, and I miss talking on GLP. You should link the thread here when you do make it 😀


      1. Attempted. Deleted immediately, though I was allowed to post. The old thread seems to be blocking proxy-replies only, hence my inability to reply on it. Let me explain: I have the resources to reply. It’s called money, but creating a paid account would give them access to my personal information and I’ve no intention of providing that to anyone. Are there ‘other’ resources that would allow me to post? the internet isn’t a magic box. If the server-side of the forum sets a ‘rule’ for replies, I can’t subvert that. Are there people within the ministry who can? Likely so. But I’d neither seek them out nor ask them to do so. It’s far too sophomoric and frankly they’d just delete my posting anyway. It’s just business I’d expect. An unpaid anonymous coward is ‘triggering’ a mentally ill, paid member. Paid member wins.

        Perhaps there are other resources for doing so but that’s not my area of expertise, nor have I the time (or great desire) to search them out. Aside from a scant few posters, I spent most of my time reading; absurdity, immeasurable schadenfreude, and demands for authentication. These people who pretend to want truth yet determine to prove-false the veracity of anything outside their alembicated, monotonous weltanschauung are a concordant testament that the work of the “Illuminati”, that MY work, is successful.

        I do understand if you are shying away from hosting here. Perhaps one day they’ll decide that I am allowed to post once more. I agree that GLP is perhaps the best place for this, warts and all.


      2. That is frankly fascinating Jos – that the mods have expended the time and energy not to allow this. This is serious food for thought for me – just purely for the ho hum aspect. I am not sure you are aware but Seer777 requested that your thread be shut down and a few days later you found yourself unable to post. Part of her reasoning was concern for me and my interest in your expertise. I didn’t expect that the mods might actually take her side – as I said that is serious food for thought. Now that we know that is off the table for the time being, believe me – I am more than happy to host it here. Of course, my blog is many magnitudes less popular than glp, but it is certainly convenient having an avenue by which we may still communicate.


  6. Kayli,

    For what it’s worth, I’m filled to overflowing with disinterest in rifling through inconsequential replies. A smaller setting would create a better conversation without all of the fatuousness. If, for whatever reason, you think that our conversations might be doing you harm, then we should indeed stop. I’ve no intention of doing harm. I set out to simply share a proper view of something that’s terribly misidentified by foolishness and in some cases, outright falsehoods for sake of personal gain.

    It bears repeating: I mean you (and no other internet poster) harm. If for whatever reason you think that I might be counter-productive to your own recovery, then I will gladly return to my work and seek the satisfaction of my social needs another way. you have but to say the words.


    1. I don’t think you are doing me harm. Honestly it is my opinion that you have been very helpful , and you are perhaps the only person whose answers have helped me find some measure of closure in my seeking. Seer is perhaps a little protective of me. I understand why she worries but I’ve done a great deal of thinking about my own situation and I honestly do not believe your presence to be harmful to me. But thank you for the consideration, that is quite gentlemanly of you.


  7. Kayli,

    I see that we have opened for business. I’m going to ask something that lacks the humility a guest ought to present: I believe the best of our conversations were regarding the modalities of my work, the truth about what the Illuminati is, and how they work, not whom my client is. I feel that the potential for the new thread is lessened if filled with questions about her favorite colors, etc. if I might be so bold, many I suggest introducing me as a Celebrity Programmer/Handler? Certainly should my client list come out in the course of a conversation that is acceptable, but I am instantly identified by my client to those ‘in the know’. My posting this information isn’t without risk. I’d ask humbly that you help me mitigate that risk by excluding her name and twitter profile from the opening post. I believe that we will have topical, more meaningful discussions and it will aid me in keeping my identity safer. I’m not seeking celebrity, I just want to chat.

    I think the picture is fine.


      1. Thank you for the adjustment. I’m not sure what’s happening bu I’m concerned that we may have reached some sort of reply limit on the other thread. I’ve attempted to reply several times but I don’t think they are reaching you.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s